Owen Paterson speaks out as being pro GM

‘GM a safe, proven and beneficial innovation’?

I wonder if the secretary of State, who is meant to be representing my interests, is really speaking for the best interests of the British and European public here or is he speaking for a multinational industry determined to push into Europe?

Where is the evidence that farmers aren’t really going to lose out through extra seed fees, ecosystems altered and the British public ultimately paying more through higher production costs. Surely we should still be following the precautionary principle at this stage? Owen Paterson needs to open his mind a little and start listening to the other side of the argument.

For a strong viable and crucially less risky alternative to GM read this article from argylesock – http://argylesock.wordpress.com/2013/06/21/are-gm-crops-out-of-date/.

Advertisements

One thought on “Owen Paterson speaks out as being pro GM

  1. This. I think Mr Paterson’s opinion is outdated and not sufficiently evidence-based. Which as you know, doesn’t mean that I’m anti-GM in a simplistic way – I like the authors who remark that there’s no simple answer to food security. Thank you for linking to the article I wrote about a different kind of biotech.

Please leave a comment

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s