I have just watched the whole series of this competition from start to finish. Superbly made and following the aspirations of 10 talented and driven young people, I highly recommend anyone who is interested in the future of the industry watches this. Very inspiring. Click the title of this post to watch the series.
Will Britain ever get a grip on Bovine TB?
It’s a topic that has groups talking from disparate backgrounds; from those concerned for badger welfare to concerned farmers with cattle businesses that are stagnant. No matter what your view is on how it should be tackled, it is clear that TB remains a big problem, particularly in the West of England. According to Department of the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA) figures, the number of cattle compulsorily slaughtered as a result of bovine TB contraction was nearly 35,000 during the period January to November 2012, compared to 31,000 for the same period in the previous year. It should be said that their figures have also shown that although the number of herds affected has risen, the incidence rate is, in general, falling. However, DEFRA stress that not too much should be read into this.
The stark reality is that over the course of 2012, 8500 British farms faced movement restrictions, grossly affecting business prospects. On top of that the crisis has cost the British taxpayer £500 million over the past decade and could rise to £1 billion in the coming decade.
photo available at fwi.co.uk
The proposed badger cull has been a topic that has raised strong views on either side. Nevertheless, pilot culls are due in 2 areas in Gloucestershire and Somerset from June of this year. An informative press release can be found at http://www.defra.gov.uk/news/2012/10/23/badger-cull/ . The RSPCA is against the cull and continues to campaign for an improvement in biosecurity on farms as well as vaccination of both cattle and badgers.
Tighter controls were placed on farms in certain counties on the 1st January of this year to make a concerted effort to reduce the risk of contraction for farms currently unaffected. We are moving towards a system that may be the ‘safest’ and the ‘least risky’ but one that punishes the farmer for something that is mostly out of his or her control. Personally, I will be very interested to see how the badger cull story develops and whether, as a result, we see real positive change to this very difficult issue the British countryside faces.
Jonathan Foley’s ‘Other Inconvenient Truth’
Jonathan Foley sets out the problems that world agriculture will face over the coming decades. Thank you to Janina’s ‘Food (policy) for thought’ blog for directing me to this lecture. http://foodpolicyforthought.wordpress.com/about/
The Generational Ownership Crisis
If you read your way through the farming pages of the broadsheets and indeed the agricultural industry papers you will notice that, yet again, land prices are on the up. In fact, Knight Frank’s review of the final quarter of 2012 says that average farmland values in England rose by almost three per cent in the whole year to £15,348/ha (£6,214/acre). It appears the rise in prices is partly due to the demand that comes from an army of commercially minded arable farmers keen to expand production in a climate that is offering currently high commodity prices. Of course prices in some areas of the country with the most productive soils, such as East Anglia, can reach up to £8,500 per acre. If you’re not part of the arable brigade, the picture isn’t quite so rosy. According to the latest figures from the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA), although cereal prices increased by 38 per cent in 2012, sheep and lamb prices have fallen by 28 per cent since November 2011. Many livestock farmers are facing serious problems in an industry that is famous for its state of flux.
Another reason behind the high prices is that insufficient amounts of land are coming onto the market in a time of high demand. Savills have announced that 134,000 acres of land was marketed across Britain in 2012 compared with 155,000 the year before, a 14 per cent decline. The land experts believe that the trend will continue for at least the next five years. In fact, Savills estimate that a 40 per cent increase in the value of better quality British farmland is possible over the next five years. It appears that farm land will remain an attractive investment both for city investors and for farmers looking to expand their businesses. Indeed it seems very likely that the projections would ring true if we were to discuss this topic five years down the line.
What of new entrants to the agricultural sector? Is it really possible for a start-up farmer to do anything other than rent his land for the duration of his career? It remains an aspiration of many farmers at the start of their careers to own the land they work but with prices seeming to be continually rising, a prospective purchase seems to realistically be only in reach of either established farm owners looking to expand their businesses or investors looking for a sound return. This is simple supply and demand economics which is combined with current buoyant commodity prices and a widespread knowledge that land is a good investment. There are of course several schemes about that help the newcomer to the business. For example, Forestry Commission Scotland has an effective start up scheme for farmers who have some experience but who lack the land, enabling them to develop a viable business. The French, who have a completely different approach to owning and renting anyway, seem to get it right when it comes to start ups, or at least this is what the Scots seem to think. The French offer direct financial support to young farmers both from Département funds and from national governmental funds, part of which are funded from EU payments. The young French farmer must fulfil a selection of criteria and is subject to a number of stipulations. However, benefits, including a fifty per cent reduction in the rate of income and land tax, as well as in stamp duty, seem to make this worthwhile.
Would this system work in the UK? I think probably not. The industry needs to be incentivised but I do not believe that we are realistically in a position to overturn the system and for the governmental purse to fully fund young start-ups. Support should come from within the industry. This is said not just in the context of a major economic crisis but in the context of a society that has become increasingly divided. We are told that HS2, the high speed rail link that will run from London to Birmingham, is required because it is in the interests of ‘the majority’. This I agree with. However, it will also turn the lives of many rural residents and businesses upside-down. We live in the age of the majority and it is an urban majority. The prospect of a reducing green belt, a rising population and an increasing number of people ignorant of the origins of the food they eat, is very real. Education and social cooperation is the key. Schemes such as Open Farm Sunday, schools starting vegetable gardens and an increasing number of farms opening their doors to the public have enabled the beginning of a greater understanding, but there remains a problem.
High land prices can be used as a metaphor for a wider social and cultural misunderstanding. With complaints that there are not enough young people entering the industry it is exactly these people we should be doing our best to help. Yes, it is possible to gain a foothold in the industry and through various tenant schemes prospective farmers are able to develop good businesses. However, when it comes to owning the land they work this remains a dim hope. Land has become a commodity like anything else, something to be traded on the world stage. Indeed, the Germans are a very popular buyer of East Anglian land today and likewise Brits go abroad to buy up African, Asian and Eastern European acres. In conclusion, therefore, we find ourselves facing not just an economic crisis but the prospect of an acute social and generational crisis also.
What is thinkingcountry?
This new blog will act as the forum I use to offer my own personal response to the items I read about and listen to relating to the subjects of food, farming, environmental and rural affairs. Being a student of history, albeit one with an interest in the agricultural and environmental sectors and in the way people in rural areas live their lives today, I may sometimes approach subjects in a slightly different way to other farming and environmental bloggers. Looking at the ways that things have been in the past, being critical, creative and original and looking for trends amongst the evidence are some of the things that I have been taught to do as an academic historian, so please forgive me if I digress into somewhat unrelated topics during my entries. Sometimes I will explore my own experiences and write about the people I meet or the practices I see. Sometimes I will look explicitly at what others are writing about and think about why it is that they have come to their view. Some entries will be about the books or reviews I read, regarding environmental and agricultural history, or current affairs. In short though, it is the fields of agriculture and the environment that I am interested in, be that from an historical or a contemporary perspective.
Environmental historian Alfred Crosby wrote, in the 1990s, about how he saw the subjects of the sciences and the liberal arts increasingly merge as people became more interested in the specific strengths of all disciplines (Crosby, Germs, Seeds and Animals: Studies in Ecological History, New York, 1994). Environmental history itself has grown to involve knowledge of fields of study as diverse as historical geography, ecology, agriculture, the history and philosophy of science, biology, climate science, forestry, archaeology, anthropology, psychology, sociology and ecological and environmental economics, amongst others. It has come to be recognised, in this discipline at least, that all subject areas and all writers have something positive to offer. In the non-academic world I believe that people should seriously consider thinking along these lines. Yes, of course we need and will always need ‘specialists’ but we also need ‘specialist generalists’, with a good depth of knowledge in a wide range of fields and skill sets, that can be related back to and utilised in one sector; in this case, food, farming and the environment.
This ‘specialist generalist’ approach is something that I personally aspire to achieve, using and learning about a range of disciplines to then approach modern concepts of how we should be running our current worlds of agriculture and environmental activities. I hope that there are others out there who share my belief that, sometimes at least, a wider experience and acceptance of using different disciplines when approaching a subject, such as the way we work our environment, is helpful in reaching a more nuanced and ultimately more effective conclusion.